Before to entry more in the question, an abductive reflexion:
Maybe the biocultural environment predict scientific production?
This question came up in our neuro-semantic networks some time ago, when we had the gift to find Organism-Environment Theory in internet.
The scientist-author is finnish, and live in the most bike-town, in the world?
Oulu have been choosed by our team, for designing a "city-index" according to the density of bike-ways: "Oulu-Index". Because can be considered as the "asintota" in the developping of "bike-friendly" cities.
Syncronicity, a term developed by Karl Jung from a semantic symbiosis between Quantum Mechanics and Chinese Philosophy, permits us to talk about this "coincidence", without more epistemological complications.
Living in Oulu, where environment is "inclusive" or friendly, means that through the direct participation of a sensorial-diverse sensosphere, the author in question has included, in a revolutionary and simple way, a very "popular truth": that our brains always work together with our bodies and our ecosystem.
In spanish we refer to this inclusive feature in our functioning brains as "CCErebro"; CCE meaning: (Cerebro+Cuerpo+Ecosistema). In english: (Brain+Body+Ecosystem). Maybe in english we culd spell: "BBErain"
To follow ignoring the enormous sensorial brainstorming that we (our neural systems) receive (and-transmit) from (and through) ecosystem, is parallel to ignore the suffering of Humandkind across the TV everyday.
But Why?
How have been possible to separate so much our disciplines (and neuro-semantic networks) to reach to this "absurd" and dramatic situation?
Infimonikal system has the virtue to see real things as real as possible.
Modern science is plenty of abstraction and simplifications.
Maybe the first dichotomy in our culture is the omnipowerful presence of a male and unic God.
Neuro-semantic networks feed information. This info can come from "out-doors" (ecosystem) or can be "endogenous" (our thinking process).
In the Bio-Cultural Phylogeny the cultural presence of this monolitic God may be considered as a Bio-Cultural Synapomorphy.
They are many Natural Spirits in Nature (animism)
There are many Gods in diferent cultures (polytheism)
Monotheism is born, as a process, by Bio-Cultural "natural drift" (from Maturana).
Turning now to Organism-Environment Theory, Infimonikal System feed very well in that theory, where no division or separation is possible within the resulting neuro-semantic landscape. When you think yourself in your own organismical presence in this actual moment, you will feel reality as a Whole, where dichotomy evaporate easily from your own sensorial systems.
Of course you feel your body, but there are not one signal or sensation informing yourself from your own organismic system. There are many sensations coming from your organism. There are many sensations perceived from "out-doors". And there are many other sensations where your neuro-semantic networks will find many difficulties for a dichotomical localization. Because this last group of sensations come from the interface wbetween you, or your body, as sensorial system, and this fuzzy set we called "out-doors".
viernes, 22 de mayo de 2009
Suscribirse a:
Enviar comentarios (Atom)
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario
a tobogam through reapparadising